<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calibrated RGB Colorspace PNGs in Firefox 3.1 β2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://graphictribe.net/blog/2009/01/25/calibrated-rgb-colorspace-pngs-in-firefox-3-1-beta2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://graphictribe.net/blog/2009/01/25/calibrated-rgb-colorspace-pngs-in-firefox-3-1-beta2</link>
	<description>Satan Est Nomen Fortitudinis In Corde Ignavi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dali Rău</title>
		<link>http://graphictribe.net/blog/2009/01/25/calibrated-rgb-colorspace-pngs-in-firefox-3-1-beta2#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dali Rău</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphictribe.net/blog/?p=259#comment-1682</guid>
		<description>Cockroach infestation…
Closing comments on this one for a little while :\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cockroach infestation…<br />
Closing comments on this one for a little while :\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dali Rău</title>
		<link>http://graphictribe.net/blog/2009/01/25/calibrated-rgb-colorspace-pngs-in-firefox-3-1-beta2#comment-1612</link>
		<dc:creator>Dali Rău</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 01:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphictribe.net/blog/?p=259#comment-1612</guid>
		<description>They seem to have fixed it in 3.1 β3… The stable 3.0.9 does it properly so, after all, it was indeed just a fuck-up. “Human error” as they always put it when one in the cubicle “fixes” something written by someone else &lt;span title=&quot;smile&quot;&gt;:)&lt;/span&gt;

Internet Exploiter is a piece of shit, of course.
8.0 does seem to be displaying alpha correctly, but —as with anything else Mi¢ro$hit— I bet it’s just a hack on top of another hack on top of the initial hack. They’ll never get it right, but who cares about IE anymore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They seem to have fixed it in 3.1 β3… The stable 3.0.9 does it properly so, after all, it was indeed just a fuck-up. “Human error” as they always put it when one in the cubicle “fixes” something written by someone else <span title="smile">:)</span></p>
<p>Internet Exploiter is a piece of shit, of course.<br />
8.0 does seem to be displaying alpha correctly, but —as with anything else Mi¢ro$hit— I bet it’s just a hack on top of another hack on top of the initial hack. They’ll never get it right, but who cares about IE anymore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick &#38; Sydney</title>
		<link>http://graphictribe.net/blog/2009/01/25/calibrated-rgb-colorspace-pngs-in-firefox-3-1-beta2#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick &#38; Sydney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphictribe.net/blog/?p=259#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>Oh the fuckups on images over the years. Apple&#039;s Preview for Tiger couldn&#039;t save twists in images. You reversed an image in Preview, saved it, then exited and opened the file and looked again. Marvelous.

And we must give credit where credit is due: transparency in PNG was introduced somewhere around 1998? Yet as recently as 2005 (at least) Microsoft&#039;s Internet Destroyer still couldn&#039;t recognise it?

But in a way things were better back in the old days. When everything looked like crap and you expected it. Then you were never ever disappointed! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh the fuckups on images over the years. Apple&#8217;s Preview for Tiger couldn&#8217;t save twists in images. You reversed an image in Preview, saved it, then exited and opened the file and looked again. Marvelous.</p>
<p>And we must give credit where credit is due: transparency in PNG was introduced somewhere around 1998? Yet as recently as 2005 (at least) Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Destroyer still couldn&#8217;t recognise it?</p>
<p>But in a way things were better back in the old days. When everything looked like crap and you expected it. Then you were never ever disappointed! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

