<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.5 Under My Skin • Upgrade Completed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://graphictribe.net/blog/2008/04/11/2point5under-my-skin/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://graphictribe.net/blog/2008/04/11/2point5under-my-skin</link>
	<description>Satan Est Nomen Fortitudinis In Corde Ignavi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dali Rău</title>
		<link>http://graphictribe.net/blog/2008/04/11/2point5under-my-skin#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>Dali Rău</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphictribe.net/blog/?p=74#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>Hihihi, same dude, I guess :)

&lt;q&gt;»» Hire ‘em both!&lt;/q&gt;
Correct word would be “enslave” and I would if I could, but it seems he’s already taken ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hihihi, same dude, I guess :)</p>
<p><q>»» Hire ‘em both!</q><br />
Correct word would be “enslave” and I would if I could, but it seems he’s already taken ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick &#38; Sydney</title>
		<link>http://graphictribe.net/blog/2008/04/11/2point5under-my-skin#comment-1513</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick &#38; Sydney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphictribe.net/blog/?p=74#comment-1513</guid>
		<description>Another cool icon. Is this the same guy made the other one? Hire &#039;em both!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another cool icon. Is this the same guy made the other one? Hire &#8216;em both!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dali Rau</title>
		<link>http://graphictribe.net/blog/2008/04/11/2point5under-my-skin#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>Dali Rau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphictribe.net/blog/?p=74#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>Hi, Steve. Thanks a lot for the comment!
I’m glad to hear you haven’t had any troubles with the upgrade either.

I haven’t looked into the galleries yet —not much use for them in my case— but still, if they’re done right, they might come in handy one day, so I’ll check them out. So far, I’ve never been disappointed with any of these updates… except, maybe, for the fact that, if you decide to go with XHTML1.1 as application/xhtml+xml (like I do it here) or plain old HTML 4.01 Strict (like I do it on my Japanese blog), there’s always the need to go inside &lt;code&gt;/includes/&lt;/code&gt; and tweak the markup, otherwise the bitch never validates.
I have no clue how to write a plugin for that and I understand &lt;code&gt;my-hacks.php&lt;/code&gt; is deprecated, so —for now— I have to do it manually every time. Reason for which I’m always in a bad mood when I have to upgrade &lt;span title=&quot;smile&quot;&gt;:)&lt;/span&gt;

But this time, the bad mood was pretty much “worst mood”, with all the shit going around about Tehnorati, Google and whatever measures it’s being rumored they’re about to take against blogs running older software.

Anyway, no biggie. An upgrade is always a good thing, so I don’t really have anything to complain &lt;span title=&quot;grin&quot;&gt;:D&lt;/span&gt;

Again, thanks a lot for dropping by!
Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Steve. Thanks a lot for the comment!<br />
I’m glad to hear you haven’t had any troubles with the upgrade either.</p>
<p>I haven’t looked into the galleries yet —not much use for them in my case— but still, if they’re done right, they might come in handy one day, so I’ll check them out. So far, I’ve never been disappointed with any of these updates… except, maybe, for the fact that, if you decide to go with XHTML1.1 as application/xhtml+xml (like I do it here) or plain old HTML 4.01 Strict (like I do it on my Japanese blog), there’s always the need to go inside <code>/includes/</code> and tweak the markup, otherwise the bitch never validates.<br />
I have no clue how to write a plugin for that and I understand <code>my-hacks.php</code> is deprecated, so —for now— I have to do it manually every time. Reason for which I’m always in a bad mood when I have to upgrade <span title="smile">:)</span></p>
<p>But this time, the bad mood was pretty much “worst mood”, with all the shit going around about Tehnorati, Google and whatever measures it’s being rumored they’re about to take against blogs running older software.</p>
<p>Anyway, no biggie. An upgrade is always a good thing, so I don’t really have anything to complain <span title="grin">:D</span></p>
<p>Again, thanks a lot for dropping by!<br />
Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://graphictribe.net/blog/2008/04/11/2point5under-my-skin#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://graphictribe.net/blog/?p=74#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>I know what you mean about the upgrades.  Glad your upgrade to 2.5 went well.  Just did mine the other day and it was pretty flawless, although the gallery stuff is a bit new and now I&#039;ve got to do a bunch of theme modifications to make some of it look better for the galleries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean about the upgrades.  Glad your upgrade to 2.5 went well.  Just did mine the other day and it was pretty flawless, although the gallery stuff is a bit new and now I&#8217;ve got to do a bunch of theme modifications to make some of it look better for the galleries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

